Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0165551507086259v1
34/3/370    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willem, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buelens, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Impact of coherent versus multiple identities on knowledge integration

Annick Willem1*, Harry Scarbrough2, and Marc Buelens3

1 Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium
2 Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK
3 Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, and Vlerick Leuven Ghent Management School, Belgium

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

This paper addresses the influence of two competing views of social identity on knowledge integration. Oneview sees social identity primarily as a coherent characteristic of organizations, which can leverage knowledgeintegration by unconditional cooperative behaviour, shared values, mindsets, trust, and loyalty. Theopposing view considers social identity as multiple and fragmented. This fragmented view emphasizes theproblematic nature of social identity for knowledge integration and states that social identity is an additionalbarrier to knowledge integration in organizations. The aim of this paper is to examine these competingaccounts and to develop insight into the underlying mechanisms that lead to the different effects of socialidentity on knowledge integration. Two polar case studies illustrate the different effects of a coherent versusmultiple identity on knowledge integration and the need for a coherent company-wide social identity, insteadof a multiple community or group based social identity, to leverage knowledge integration in organizations.

Key Words: case studies; knowledge integration; multiple social identities; organization theory; organization-wide social identity; social identity

First published on February 5, 2008, doi:10.1177/0165551507086259

Journal of Information Science 2008;34:370.

A more recent version of this article appeared on June 1, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?