Better reporting of randomized trials in biomedical journal and conference abstracts

UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Well reported research published in conference and journal abstracts is important as individuals reading these reports often base their initial assessment of a study based on information reported in the abstract. However, there is growing concern about the reliability and quality of information published in these reports. This article provides an overview of research evidence underpinning the need for better reporting of abstracts reported in conference proceedings and abstracts of journal articles; with a particular focus in the area of health care. Where available we highlight evidence which refers specifically to abstracts reporting randomized trials. We seek to identify current initiatives aimed at improving the reporting of these reports and recommend that an extension of the CONSORT Statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials), CONSORT for Abstracts, be developed. This checklist would include a list of essential items to be reported in any conference or journal abstract reporting the results of a randomized trial.

Key Words: randomized controlled trial; methodological quality; structured abstracts; checklists; conference proceedings

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?