Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0165551507079733v1
0165551507079733v2
34/2/131    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bronstein, J.
Right arrow Articles by Baruchson-Arbib, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

The application of cost–benefit and least effort theories in studies of information seeking behavior of humanities scholars: The case of Jewish studies scholars in Israel

Jenny Bronstein1* and Shifra Baruchson-Arbib2

1 Beit Berl College, Beit Berl, Israel
2 Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.


   Abstract

The study investigated the process of information channel selection of Jewish studies scholars in Israel according to two theoretical frameworks, the ‘cost–benefit ratio’ that focused on the quality of the information provided by the channel and the ‘least effort principle’ that focused on the accessibility of the channel. The study sought to identify which of the two parameters, quality of information or accessibility of the channel, was the decisive one when selecting an information channel. In order to further understand the underlying principle behind scholars’ choice of information channels participants were asked about the obstacles they face when searching for information. Four obstacles were stipulated in the structured questionnaire: (1) cost; (2) distance, when the item can only be found at a distant location; (3) unfriendly interface; and (4) time thatit takes to get hold of a copy of the desired item. Findings showed that, in general, participants’ information channel use was not affected by the obstacles encountered in the information seeking process and that the quality of the information was the decisive factor in choosing an information channel.

Key Words: information seeking behavior, information channel use, humanists, cost–benefit ratio, least effort principle

First published on July 12, 2007, doi:10.1177/0165551507079733

Journal of Information Science 2008;34:131.

A more recent version of this article appeared on April 1, 2008
This version was published on July 25, 2007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
A. Uyar
Google stemming mechanisms
Journal of Information Science, October 1, 2009; 35(5): 499 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
G. Bin
Moderating effects of task characteristics on information source use: An individual-level analysis of R&D professionals in new product development
Journal of Information Science, October 1, 2009; 35(5): 527 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]