Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kam, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies

Stuart Macdonald

Management School, University of Sheffield, UK, s.macdonald{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Jacqueline Kam

School of Economics, Finance and Management, University of Bristol, UK

Publication in quality journals has become a major indicator of research performance in UK universities. This paper investigates the notion of `quality journal' and finds dizzying circularity in its definitions. Actually, what a quality journal is does not really matter: agreement that there are such things matters very much indeed. As so often happens with indicators of performance, the indicator has become the target. So, the challenge is to publish in quality journals, and the challenge rewards gamesmanship. Vested interests have become particularly skilful at the game, and at exercising the winners' prerogative of changing the rules. All but forgotten in the desperation to win the game is publication as a means of communicating research findings for the public benefit. The paper examines the situation in management studies, but the problem is much more widespread. It concludes that laughter is both the appropriate reaction to such farce, and also, perhaps, the stimulus to reform.

Key Words: quality journal • citation • peer review • publication • research • management studies • Research Assessment Exercise

References

  • J. Barnard, Reflections on Britain's Research Assessment Exercise, Journal of Legal Education 48(4) (1998) 467—95.[Web of Science]
  • M. Thornton, Corrosive leadership (or bullying by another name): a corollary of the corporatised academy? Australian Journal of Labour Law 17(2) (2004) 161—84.
  • J. Trieschmann, A. Denis, G. Northcraft and A. Niemi, Jr, Serving multiple constituencies in the business school: MBA program vs. research performance, Academy of Management Journal 43(6) (2000) 1130—41.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • J. Alexander and R. Mabry, Relative significance of journals, authors, and papers cited in financial research, Journal of Finance 49(2) ( 1994) 697—712.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • F. Narin and K. Hamilton, Bibliometric performance measures, Scientometrics 36(3) ( 1996) 293—310.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • M. Porta, The bibliographic `impact factor' of the Institute for Scientific Information: how relevant is it really for Public Health journals? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 50(6) (1996) 606—10.[Free Full Text]
  • E. Garfield, What is the `core' literature of Biochemistry as compared to the `core' of Chemistry? In: E. Garfield, Essays of an Information Scientist Volume 1 (ISI, Philadelphia, 1977) 262—5.
  • E. Garfield, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science 178(4060) (1972) 471—9.[Free Full Text]
  • M. Amin and M. Mabe, Impact factors: use and abuse, Perspectives in Publishing 1 (October, 2000) 1—6.
  • Ssrn, SSRN Top Downloads (2005). Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/topten/topTenResults.cfm?groupingtype=3&groupingId=1 (accessed September 2005 ).
  • Hefce, Research Funding: Introduction of a Policy Factor. Publication 98/54 (Consultation paper, Higher Education Funding Council for England, 1998).
  • K. Weick, Mundane poetics: searching for wisdom in Organization Studies, Organization Studies 25(4) (2004) 653—68.[Abstract]
  • C. Oppenheim, Do citations count? Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), Serials 9(2) (1996) 155—61.
  • J. Donohue and J. Fox, A multi-method evaluation of journals in the decision and management sciences by US academics, Omega 28(1) (2000) 17—36.[CrossRef]
  • M. Boor, Unfamiliarity breeds disdain: comment on department chairmen's ratings of psychological journals, American Psychologist 28(11) (1973) 1012—13.
  • J. Levin and T. Kratochwill, The name of the journal fame game, American Psychologist 31(9) ( 1976) 673—74.[CrossRef]
  • V. Theoharakis and A. Hirst, Perceptual differences of Marketing journals: a worldwide perspective, Marketing Letters 13(4) (2002) 389—402.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • S. Park and M. Gordon, Publication records and tenure decisions in the field of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal 17(2) (1996) 109—28.[CrossRef]
  • A.-W. Harzing, Journal Quality List,13th Edition, 10 January (2005). Available at: www.harzing.com (accessed May 2005).
  • P. Podsakoff, S. Mackenzie, D. Bachrach and N. Podsakoff, The influence of Management journals in the 1980s and 1990s, Strategic Management Journal 26(5) (2005) 473—88.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • J. Johnson and P. Podsakoff, Journal influence in the field of Management: an analysis using Salancik's Index in a dependency network, Academy of Management Journal 37(5) ( 1994) 1392—1407.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • L. Parker, J. Guthrie and R. Gray, Accounting and Management research: passwords from the gatekeepers, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 11(4) (1998) 371—406.[CrossRef]
  • C. Baden-Fuller, F. Ravazzolo and T. Schweizer, Making and measuring reputations, Long Range Planning 33(5) (2000) 621—50.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • K. Borokhovich, R. Bricker, K. Brunarski and B. Simkins, Finance research productivity and influence, Journal of Finance 50(5) (1995) 1691—1717.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • R. Fishe, What are the research standards for full professor of Finance?, Journal of Finance 53(3) (1998) 1053—79.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • T. Dewett and A. DeNisi, Exploring scholarly reputation: it's more than just productivity, Scientometrics 60(2) (2004) 249—72.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • M. MacRoberts and B. MacRoberts, Problems of citation analysis: a critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(5) ( 1989) 342— 9.
  • S. Kirkpatrick and E. Locke, The development of measures of faculty scholarship, Group & Organization Management 17(1) (1992) 5—23.[Abstract]
  • B. Donovan, The truth about peer review, Learned Publishing 11(3) (1998) 179—84.
  • B. Pierce and G. Garven, Publishing international business research: a survey of leading journals, Journal of International Business Studies 26(1) (1995) 69—89.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • V. Bence and C. Oppenheim, The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise, Learned Publishing 17(1) (2004) 53—68.
  • D. Feldman (ed.), Journal of Management), Personal correspondence (May, 2005).
  • J. Polonsky, G. Jones and M. Kearsley, Accessibility: an alternative method of ranking Marketing journals, Journal of Marketing Education 21(3) ( 1999) 181—93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • S. Ali, H. Young and N. Ali, Determining the quality of publications and research for tenure and promotion decisions, Library Review 45(1) ( 1996) 39—53.
  • T. Phelan, A compendium of issues for citation analysis, Scientometrics 45(1) (1999) 117—36.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • P. Seglen, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, British Medical Journal 314(15 February) (1997) 497—502.[Free Full Text]
  • A. Tahai and M. Meyer, A revealed preference study of Management journals' direct influences, Strategic Management Journal 20(3) ( 1999) 279—96.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • V. Bence and C. Oppenheim, The influence of peer review on the Research Assessment Exercise, Journal of Information Science 30(4) ( 2004) 347—68.[Abstract]
  • F. Rowland, The peer-review process, Learned Publishing 15(4) (2002) 247—58.
  • K. Campbell, D. Vick, A. Murray and G. Little, Journal publishing, journal reputation, and the United Kingdom's Research Assessment Exercise, Journal of Law and Society 26(4) (1999) 470—501.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • J. Brown, Editorial: the citation rating game, British Society for Plant Pathology Newsletter 31 (1997) Autumn. Available at: www.bspp.org.uk/bsppnews/bsppnews31/bsppnews31.htm (accessed May 2005)
  • G. Roberts, Review of Research Assessment: A Report to the Funding Bodies, HEFCE Report 22 (May 2003) (HEFCE, Bristol, 2003).
  • S. Harley, The impact of research selectivity on academic work and identity in UK universities, Studies in Higher Education 27(2) ( 2002) 187—205.[Web of Science]
  • T. Albert, Why bother with peer review? Lancet 350 (1997) 822.
  • R. Coe and I. Weinstock, Evaluating the management journals: a second look, Academy of Management Journal 27(3) (1984) 660— 66.
  • E. Fry, C. Walters and L. Scheuermann, Perceived quality of fifty selected journals: academicians and practitioners, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 13(2) (1985) 352—61.[CrossRef]
  • M. Extejt and J. Smith, The behavioural sciences and Management: an evaluation of relevant journals, Journal of Management 16(3) (1990) 539—51.[Abstract]
  • H. Willmott, Managing the academics: commodification and control in the development of university education in the UK, Human Relations 48(9) (1995) 993—1027.[Abstract]
  • C. Humphrey, P. Moizer and D. Owen, Questioning the value of the research selectivity process in British university accounting, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 8(3) ( 1995) 141—64.[CrossRef]
  • L. Walford, The Research Assessment Exercise: its effect on scholarly journal publishing, Learned Publishing 13(1) (2000) 49—52.
  • G. Williams, Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's Research Assessment Exercise, British Medical Journal 316(7137) ( 1998) 1079—82.[Free Full Text]
  • B. Moret, Bridging the gap between theory and practice, Journal of Electronic Publishing 3(1) (1997). Available at: www.press.umich.edu/jep/03-01/JEA.html (accessed March 2005).
  • G. Tellis, C. Rajesh and D. Ackerman, In search of diversity: the record of major Marketing journals, Journal of Marketing Research 36(1) ( 1999) 120—31.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • M. Mahoney, Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cognitive Therapy and Research 1(2) (1977) 161—75.[CrossRef]
  • A. Misakian and L. Bero, Publication bias and research on passive smoking, Journal of the American Medical Association 280(3) ( 1998) 250— 53.
  • One of the referees of this paper, September 2006.
  • S. Harnad, The invisible hand of peer review, Exploit Interactive 5 ( 2000 ) April. Available at: www.exploit-lib.org/issue5/peer-review/ (accessed May 2005).
  • C. Bunting, Early careers spent grinding teeth, not cutting them, Times Higher Education Supplement 25 February (2005) 18.
  • E. van Teijlingen and V. Hundley, Getting your paper to the right journal: a case study of an academic paper, Journal of Advanced Nursing 37(6) ( 2002) 506—11.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • J. Armstrong, Peer review of scientific papers, Journal of Biological Response Modifiers 3(1) (1984) 10—14.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • P. Jarley, T. Chandler and L. Faulk, Are we playing the same game? Publishing task environments and research productivity among Management specialists, Human Relations 51(6) (1998) 799—824.
  • A. Bedeian, Peer review and the social construction of knowledge in the Management discipline, Academy of Management Learning and Education 3(2) (2004) 198—216.
  • J. Lewis, Funding social science research in academia, Social Policy and Administration 34(4) (2000) 365—76.[CrossRef]
  • S. Potter, The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1966).
  • L. Lucas, The Research `Game': a Sociological Study of Academic Research Work in Two Universities (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Warwick, 2001).
  • S. Harley, M. Muller-Camen and A. Collin, From academic communities to managed organisations: the implications for academic careers in UK and German universities, Journal of Vocational Behavior 64(2) (2004) 329—45.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • J. Geary, L. Marriott and M. Rowlinson, Journal rankings in Business and Management and the 2001 Research Assessment exercise in the UK, British Journal of Management 15(2) (2004) 95—141.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • I. Rowlands, Emerald authorship data: Lotka's law and research productivity, ASLIB Proceedings 57(1) (2005) 5—10.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • G. Howard, S. Maxwell, S. Berra and M. Sternitzke, Institutional research productivity in Industrial/ Organizational Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology 70(1) (1985) 233— 6.
  • W. Henry and E. Burch, Institutional contributions to scholarly journals of business, Journal of Business 47(1) (1974) 56—66.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • S. Liebowitz and J. Palmer, Assessing the relative impacts of Economics journals, Journal of Economic Literature 22(1) (1984) 77—88.[Web of Science]
  • Sage promotion leaflet, 2005.
  • J. Sweetland, Errors in bibliographic citations: a continuing problem, Library Quarterly 59(4) (1989) 291—304.[Web of Science]
  • N. Pope, Accuracy of references in ten Library Science journals, Research Quarterly 32(2) (1992) 240—43.
  • A.-W. Harzing, Are our referencing errors undermining our scholarship and credibility? The case of expatriate failure rates, Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(1) (2002) 127—48.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • D. de Solla Price, The citation cycle. In: B. Griffith (ed.), Key Papers in Information Science (Knowledge Industry Publications, White Plains, New York, 1980) 195—210.
  • S. Redner, Citation statistics from 110 years of Physical Review, Physics Today 58(June) (2005) 49—54.
  • F. Thorne, The citation index: another case of spurious validity, Journal of Clinical Psychology 33(4) (1977) 1157—61.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • L. Baird and C. Oppenheim, Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science 20(1) ( 1994) 2—15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • D. Yaalon, More on citation analysis, Nature 378(6559) (1995) 760.
  • G. Vastag and F. Montabon, Journal characteristics, rankings and social acculturation in Operations Management, Omega 30(2) (2002) 109—26.[CrossRef]
  • A. Sheikh, Publication ethics and the Research Assessment Exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship, Journal of Medical Ethics 26(6) ( 2000) 422—6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • M. Matsuda, Affirmative action and legal knowledge: planting seeds in plowed—up ground, Harvard Women's Law Journal 11(Spring) (1988) 1—17.
  • N. Goodman, Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical research, British Medical Journal 309(6967) (1994) 1482.[Free Full Text]
  • D. Shapiro, N. Wenger and M. Shapiro, The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers, Journal of the American Medical Association 271(6) (1994) 438—42.[CrossRef]
  • D. Hamilton, Publishing by — and for? — the numbers, Science 250(4986) (1990) 1331—32.[Free Full Text]
  • D. Hamilton, Research papers: who's uncited now?, Science 251(4989) (1991) 25.[Free Full Text]
  • P. Seglen, The skewness of science, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43(9) (1992) 628—38.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • E. Hackett, Science as a vocation in the 1990s: the changing organizational culture of academic science, Journal of Higher Education 61(3) (1990) 241—79.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • A. Bedeian, The manuscript review process: the proper roles of authors, referees and editors, Journal of Management Inquiry 12(4) ( 2003) 331—8.[Abstract]
  • A. Day, How to Get Research Published in Journals (Gower, Aldershot, 1997).
  • L. Waters, Enemies of Promise: Publishing, Perishing, and the Eclipse of Scholarship (Prickly Paradigm Press, Chicago, 2004).
  • G. Ellison, The slowdown of the Economics publishing process, Journal of Political Economy 110(5) (2002) 947—93.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • O. Azar, Rejections and the importance of first response times, International Journal of Social Economics 31(3) (2004) 259—74.[CrossRef]
  • A.-W. Harzing, Australian research output in Economics and Business: high volume, low impact? Australian Journal of Management 30(2) ( 2005) 183—98.
  • P. Spector, When reviewers become authors: a comment on the journal review process, Academy of Management Research Methods Forum 3 (1998). Available at: http://division.aomonline.org/rm/1998_forum_reviewers_become_authors.html (accessed August 2006).
  • J. Armstrong, Unintelligible Management research and academic prestige, Interfaces 10(2) (1980) 80—86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • J. Miner, Commentary on Arthur Bedeian's `The manuscript review process: the proper roles of authors, referees, and editors', Journal of Management Inquiry 12(4) (2003) 339—43.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • C. Perrow, Journaling careers. In: L. Cummings and P. Frost (eds), Publishing in the Organizational Sciences (Sage, London, 1985) 203—15.
  • M. Henkel, The modernisation of research evaluation: the case of the UK, Higher Education 38(1) (1999) 105—22.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • G. Easton and D. Easton, Marketing journals and the Research Assessment Exercise, Journal of Marketing Management 19(1—2) ( 2003) 5—24.[CrossRef]
  • S. Tomlinson, The Research Assessment Exercise and medical research, British Medical Journal 320(4 March) (2000) 636— 9.[Free Full Text]
  • R. Ormerod and I. Kiossis, OR/MS publications: extension of the analysis of US flagship journals to the United Kingdom, Operations Research 45(2) (1997) 178—87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • N. Piercy, Why it is fundamentally stupid for a business school to try to improve its Research Assessment Exercise score, European Journal of Marketing 34(1/2) (2000) 27—35.[CrossRef]
  • I. Macmillan, Toward a forum for entrepreneurship scholars, Journal of Business Venturing 4(5) (1989) 289—90.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • V. Bence and C. Oppenheim, Does Bradford-Zipf apply to Business and Management journals in the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise? Journal of Information Science 30(5) (2004) 469—74.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • J. Bessant, S. Birley, C. Cooper, S. Dawson, J. Gennard, M. Gardiner, A. Gray, P. Jones, C. Mayer, J. McGee, M. Pidd, G. Rowley, J. Saunders and A. Stark, The state of the field in UK Management research: reflections of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) Panel, British Journal of Management 14(1) (2003) 51—68.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • S. Harley and F. Lee, Research selectivity, managerialism, and the academic labor process: the future of nonmainstream Economics in UK universities, Human Relations 50(11) ( 1997) 1427—60.[Abstract]
  • M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997).
  • M. Strathern, Improving ratings: audit in the British university system, European Review 5(3) (1997) 305—21.[CrossRef]
  • R. Pieters, H. Baumgartner, J. Vermunt and T. Bijmolt, Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing 16(2) (1999) 113—27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • R. Franke, T. Edlund and F. Oster, The development of Strategic Management: journal quality and article import, Strategic Management Journal 11(3) (1990) 243—53.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • M. Stahl, T. Leap and Z. Wei, Publication in leading Management journals as a measure of institutional research productivity, Academy of Management Journal 31(3) (1988) 707—20.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • D. Jones, S. Sharifi and S. Conway, Accounting for Organization: round up the usual suspects, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 17(2/3) (2006) 283—304.[CrossRef]
  • K. May, Growth and quality of the mathematical literature, Isis 59(4) (1968) 363—71.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • J. Pfeffer, Barriers to the advance of Organizational Science: paradigm development as a dependent variable, Academy of Management Review 18(4) (1993) 599—620.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • R. D'Aveni, A multiple-constituency, status-based approach to interorganizational mobility of faculty and input-output competition among top business schools, Organization Science 7(2) (1996) 166—89.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • J. Armstrong, Why management fads persist: on experience curves, the BCG matrix, escalation bias, and such (Mimeo, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1994).
  • A. Reisman and F. Kirschnick, Research strategies used by OR/MS workers as shown by an analysis of papers in flagship journals, Operations Research 43(5) (1995) 731—40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • C. McCutchen, Peer review: treacherous servant, disastrous master, Technology Review 94(7) (1991) 28—40.
  • R. Whitley, The structure and context of Economics as a scientific field, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 4 (1986) 179—209.
  • R. Wray, The social source and implications of the HIV-Aids model (Mimeo, University of Denver, 1994).
  • C. Cooper and D. Otley, The 1996 Research Assessment Exercise for Business and Management, British Journal of Management 9(2) ( 1998) 73—89.[CrossRef]
  • S. Kerr, On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B, Academy of Management Journal 18(4) (1975) 769—83.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • D. Tranfield and K. Starkey, The nature, social organization and promotion of Management research: towards policy, British Journal of Management 9(4) (1998) 341—53.[CrossRef]
  • K. Starkey and P. Madan, Bridging the relevance gap: aligning stakeholders in the future of Management research, British Journal of Management 12 (2001 ) S3—S26.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • H. Miller, The Management of Change in Universities (Open University Press, Buckingham, 1995 ).
  • M. Parker and D. Jary, The McUniversity: organization, management and academic subjectivity, Organization 2(2) (1995) 319—38.[Abstract]
  • R. Merton, The Matthew Effect in science, II: cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property, Isis 79(4) ( 1988) 606—23.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • M. Harmon, Business research and Chinese patriotic poetry: how competition for status distorts the priority between research and teaching in US business schools, Academy of Management Learning & Education 5(2) (2006) 234—43.[Web of Science]

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33, No. 6, 702-717 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0165551507077419
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
R. Klimoski
Begin the Journey With the End in Mind
Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2009; 12(2): 239 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kam, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?