This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0165551508098603v1 35/2/244    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by López-Illescas, C. Articles by Moed, H. F. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Comparing bibliometric country-by-country rankings derived from the Web of Science and Scopus: the effect of poorly cited journals in oncology

SCImago Group, Department of Library and Information Science, University of Granada, Spain, carlopz{at}ugr.es

Félix de Moya Anegón

SCImago Group, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain

Henk F. Moed

Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, The Netherlands

This article addresses the robustness of country-by-country rankings according to the number of published articles and their average citation impact in the field oncology. It compares rankings based on bibliometric indicators derived from the Web of Science (WoS) with those calculated from Scopus. It is found that the oncological journals in Scopus not covered by WoS tend to be nationally oriented journals, i.e. they mainly serve a national research community, and play as of yet a more peripheral role in the international journal communication system. In expanding the set of WoS journals with Scopus journals not indexed for WoS, the countries that profit most in terms of percentage of published documents tend to show a decline in their average citation rate. This paradoxical finding is further explained by mathematical—statistical considerations, and interpreted as a short term effect. The paper discusses its implications for the construction of bibliometric indicators.

Key Words: citation analysis • journal impact factor • oncology • Scopus • Web of Science

This version was published on April 1, 2009

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 35, No. 2, 244-256 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0165551508098603


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?