Journal of Information Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0165551506070708v1
33/2/181    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hall, H.
Right arrow Articles by Goody, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
This version was published on April 1, 2007
Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, 181-188 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0165551506070708
© 2007 Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals

KM, culture and compromise: interventions to promote knowledge sharing supported by technology in corporate environments

Hazel Hall

School of Computing, Napier University, Edinburgh, UK, h.hall{at}napier.ac.uk

Melanie Goody

KPMG LLP, London, UK

The theme of knowledge sharing is discussed extensively in the knowledge management literature. Such work tends to focus on the barriers that impede knowledge sharing activity. Of these ‘culture’ is commonly cited as a major obstacle. This article examines what is meant by the term ‘culture’. In the context of efforts to promote good practice in knowledge management, it is argued that straightforward reference to culture as a barrier to knowledge sharing is inadequate. Rather, firms should be looking at power issues and, in particular, organizational politics to explain success and failure in attempts to motivate knowledge sharing. The domain of sociotechnical studies is considered as a means of unpicking cultural issues at work in specific environments through the deployment of actor-network theory to identify shifting organizational power relationships.

Key Words: actor-network theory • knowledge management • knowledge sharing • organizational behaviour • power issues • sociotechnical studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
G. Widen-Wulff, S. Ek, M. Ginman, R. Perttila, P. Sodergard, and A.-K. Totterman
Information behaviour meets social capital: a conceptual model
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 346 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]