This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0165551506070706v1 33/2/163    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rowley, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy

Bangor Business School, University of Wales, Bangor, UK, j.e.rowley{at}bangor.ac.uk

This paper revisits the data-information-knowledge-wisdom (DIKW) hierarchy by examining the articulation of the hierarchy in a number of widely read textbooks, and analysing their statements about the nature of data, information, knowledge, and wisdom. The hierarchy referred to variously as the ‘Knowledge Hierarchy’, the ‘Information Hierarchy’ and the ‘Knowledge Pyramid’ is one of the fundamental, widely recognized and ‘taken-for-granted’ models in the information and knowledge literatures. It is often quoted, or used implicitly, in definitions of data, information and knowledge in the information management, information systems and knowledge management literatures, but there has been limited direct discussion of the hierarchy. After revisiting Ackoff’s original articulation of the hierarchy, definitions of data, information, knowledge and wisdom as articulated in recent textbooks in information systems and knowledge management are reviewed and assessed, in pursuit of a consensus on definitions and transformation processes. This process brings to the surface the extent of agreement and dissent in relation to these definitions, and provides a basis for a discussion as to whether these articulations present an adequate distinction between data, information, and knowledge. Typically information is defined in terms of data, knowledge in terms of information, and wisdom in terms of knowledge, but there is less consensus in the description of the processes that transform elements lower in the hierarchy into those above them, leading to a lack of definitional clarity. In addition, there is limited reference to wisdom in these texts.

Key Words: DIKW hierarchy • wisdom hierarchy • wisdom • knowledge management • wisdom management

This version was published on April 1, 2007

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 33, No. 2, 163-180 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0165551506070706


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. Beautyman and A. K. Shenton When does an academic information need stimulate a school-inspired information want? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, June 1, 2009; 41(2): 67 - 80. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Fricke The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy Journal of Information Science, April 1, 2009; 35(2): 131 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. K. Shenton and A. Johnson Young People's Perspectives on `Information' -- Revisited IFLA Journal, October 1, 2008; 34(3): 238 - 255. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Bawden Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants: the developing foundations of information science Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 415 - 426. [Abstract] [PDF]