This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0165551506068153v1 33/2/115    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fry, J. Articles by Talja, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources

Oxford Internet Institute, One St Giles, Oxford OX1 3JS, UK, jenny.fry{at}oii.ox.ac.uk

Sanna Talja

Department of Information Studies, University of Tampere, Kanslerinne 1, Pinni A, FIN-33014, Finland

This paper looks at disciplinary differences in the production, relevance, and use of three predominant genres of informal scholarly communication on the internet: academic mailing lists; scholarly homepages, and scholar-produced decentralized digital resources. The aim is to contribute to the development of a theoretical framework for understanding and explaining disciplinary differences in the shaping of networked resources. We apply Whitley’s theory of the intellectual and social organization of academic fields to explain variation in forms and types of digital resources across fields. The paper extends Whitley’s theory by applying his key domain analytic concepts ‘task uncertainty’ and ‘mutual dependence’ to explain scholarly communication practices in the digital realm. The empirical data spans seven intellectual fields across the natural sciences, health sciences, humanities, and social sciences. The analysis shows that, while there are similarities in the scholarly production of information genres on the internet, Whitley’s theory helps in identifying and understanding the diversity and heterogeneity of electronic communication fora across fields.

Key Words: scholarly communication • digital environment • web publishing • informal communication

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?