Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willem, A.
Right arrow Articles by Scarbrough, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The role of inter-unit coordination mechanisms in knowledge sharing: a case study of a British MNC

Annick Willem

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium

Marc Buelens

Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School, Belgium; Faculty of Economics and Business Administration,Ghent University, Belgium

Harry Scarbrough

Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, UK

Valuable knowledge in organizations is too often ‘locked in’ within one unit. The contribution of this paper is to provide insights into the knowledge-sharing effect of inter-unit coordination mechanisms. This topic has not yet received in-depth study. We fill this gap with a case study of a UK-based multinational, in which we explore knowledge sharing between business units. Data was collected using a questionnaire and interviews. The findings from our study highlight that formal coordination is preferable. Informal networking as an inter-unit coordination mechanism was not perceived as beneficial for knowledge sharing. The knowledge-sharing enablers, trust and knowledge complexity, largely dominated the possibilities for inter-unit knowledge sharing whatever coordination was used. Especially, the perceived knowledge complexity caused problems that could not be fully compensated for by any type of coordination mechanism. The study also highlights the unexpectedly minor role of common knowledge and the only indirect effect of coordination through values.

Key Words: case study • coordination mechanisms • knowledge sharing • multinationals • organization structure

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 32, No. 6, 539-561 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0165551506067128


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
A. Willem, H. Scarbrough, and M. Buelens
Impact of coherent versus multiple identities on knowledge integration
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 370 - 386.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
G. Widen-Wulff, S. Ek, M. Ginman, R. Perttila, P. Sodergard, and A.-K. Totterman
Information behaviour meets social capital: a conceptual model
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2008; 34(3): 346 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]