This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Koufogiannakis, D. Articles by Crumley, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research

John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta Libraries, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, denise.koufogiannakis{at}ualberta.ca

Linda Slater

John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta Libraries, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Ellen Crumley

Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Objective: To conduct a content analysis of library and information studies (LIS) literature published in 2001 and test the domains developed by Crumley and Koufogiannakis. Methods: A comprehensive list of refereed library and information studies journals was compiled and reviewed independently by two researchers to derive a list of included journals. Articles published in 2001 from included journals were independently assessed for relevancy by two researchers. Researchers separately extracted and checked data from included articles.

Results: 217 LIS journals were reviewed and 107 were included; 91 journals provided data. 2664 journal articles were examined, with 807 (30.3%) classified as research. The Top 10 journals for research published in 2001 were: 1) JASIST, 2) Scientometrics, 3) Info Proc & Man; 4) Coll & Res Lib, 5) Tie: J Lib Adm/Bull Med Lib Assn, 7) Libs & Culture, 8) J Doc, 9) Tie: J Info Sci/J Acad Libr. For the period studied, descriptive research (329 out of 807 articles) was published far more frequently than any other type. The domain Information Access & Retrieval had the highest number of research articles (314/807), followed by Collections (193/807), Management (135/807), Education (95/807) and Reference (77/807). Two new possible domains were identified: Library History and Professional Issues. Conclusions: Because 36 articles fell into the domain of Professional Issues, a case can be made to add this domain to Crumley and Koufogiannakis’ taxonomy. Library History was not added as a domain because historical research is not used for evidence-based decision-making. There was no evidence to support keeping the Marketing & Promotion domain. LISA provides the best coverage of the top 10 LIS research journals identified in this study.

Key Words: content analysis • evidence-based librarianship • library and information studies research • library and information studies periodicals • research domains

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30, No. 3, 227-239 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0165551504044668


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Chin-Feng, T. Hsien-Tang, and F. Chen-Su A logic deduction of expanded means-end chains Journal of Information Science, February 1, 2006; 32(1): 5 - 16. [Abstract] [PDF]