Journal of Information Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thelwall, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Information Science, Vol. 28, No. 6, 483-491 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/016555150202800604

The top 100 linked-to pages on UK university web sites: high inlink counts are not usually associated with quality scholarly content

Mike Thelwall

University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK, m.thelwall{at}wlv.ac.uk

High citation counts are usually indicators of high-quality research, but is the same true for counts of links to academic web pages? The belief that links can be used to indicate quality or utility on the Web in general drives the highly successful search engine Google, lending additional pertinence to this question. The 100 highest linked-to pages on university web sites were obtained from link counts between institutions in the UK, excluding same university links. The results split into two parts. (1) It is discovered that 23 of the original top pages owed their high counts to the automatic inclusion of links in web pages on other sites, usually on one other university site. It is concluded that simple link counts are highly unreliable indicators of the average behaviour of scholars. (2) After excluding these 23 pages only one of the top 100 contained scholarly content equivalent to a journal article, although several were e-journals or databases of academic publications. Aside from the 45 university home pages, the most common targets were collections of external links and home pages of collections of subject-specific information or resources. It is concluded that the most highly linked-to pages are those that facilitate access to a wide range of information, rather than providing specific content. Implications of these two findings for the newly emerging area of cybermetrics are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?