Journal of Information Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muir, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Information Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, 173-186 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/016555150202800301

National Information Policy developments worldwide I: electronic government

Adrienne Muir

Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

Charles Oppenheim

Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK, c.oppenheim{at}lboro.ac.uk

A review of recent Government initiatives in the area of e-Government based upon a review of the literature is presented. The desk research covered the period 1997 to 2001, and covered a number of major countries, including Canada, USA, Member States of the European Union, South Africa, Hong Kong, Australia and New Zealand. The UK was not included in the survey. The targets set by Government are often vague, and few governments seem to have addressed in any thoughtful manner the problems citizens might have with use of technology. An approach along the lines of ‘this is bound to happen’ rather than ‘what sort of society do we really want?’ is a common feature amongst all the approaches examined. The risks of enhancing the digital divide are also rarely explicitly addressed. Comments regarding good initiatives that offer models for other countries to adopt are made. The emergence of government portals is without doubt the most significant development. These provide the facility for personalization by the user. The New Zealand Government’s efforts to ensure that its web sites are useful for citizens who have difficulty spelling and the Canadian Government’s use of minority languages are also noteworthy. The leading countries are Australia, New Zealand, USA and Canada. The Australian Government’s e-procurement strategy is a role model for the future.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
E. Orna
Information policies: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 547 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Disability Policy StudiesHome page
P. T. Jaeger
The Social Impact of an Accessible E-Democracy: Disability Rights Laws in the Development of the Federal E-Government
Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 2004; 15(1): 19 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
A. Muir and C. Oppenheim
National Information Policy developments worldwide II: universal access - addressing the digital divide
Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2002; 28(4): 263 - 273.
[Abstract] [PDF]