|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Managing the paradox: the valuation of knowledge and knowledge management
Penelope Yates-Mercer
City University, London, UK, paym{at}soi.city.ac.uk
David Bawden
City University, London, UK
The valuation of knowledge, and hence the assessment of the usefulness of approaches and programmes for managing knowledge, is a difficult, yet vital, task. This paper reviews some recent approaches, setting them in a context of wider philosophical and pragmatic issues. It identifies some paradoxical qualities of information and knowledge at the heart of this topic, and considers their implications.
Journal of Information Science, Vol. 28, No. 1,
19-29 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/016555150202800103

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Y.K. Chua and D. H. Goh
Untying the knot of knowledge management measurement: a study of six public service agencies in Singapore
Journal of Information Science,
June 1, 2008;
34(3):
259 - 274.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Sakalaki and S. Kazi
How much is information worth? Willingness to pay for expert and non-expert informational goods compared to material goods in lay economic thinking
Journal of Information Science,
June 1, 2007;
33(3):
315 - 325.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Jashapara
The emerging discourse of knowledge management: a new dawn for information science research?
Journal of Information Science,
April 1, 2005;
31(2):
136 - 148.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Oppenheim, J. Stenson, and R. M.S. Wilson
Studies on Information as an Asset III: Views of Information Professionals
Journal of Information Science,
April 1, 2004;
30(2):
181 - 190.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Oppenheim, J. Stenson, and R. M. S. Wilson
Studies on Information as an Asset I: Definitions
Journal of Information Science,
June 1, 2003;
29(3):
159 - 166.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|