Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, D.
Right arrow Articles by Blackburn, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Digital health information provision and health outcomes

David Nicholas

City University, London, UK, nicky{at}soi.city.ac.uk

Paul Huntington

City University, London, UK

Peter Williams

City University, London, UK

Paul Blackburn

City University, London, UK

An online questionnaire survey of more than 1,000 users of a consumer health website, SurgeryDoor, was conducted, which sought to discover why the site was consulted and whether the information obtained from it had any health outcome. The majority of respondents were women and middle aged. Doctors were the first port of call for information, but 50% of respondents cited the Internet as one of their top three information sources. Most people did not come to the site with a particular illness or medical condition. Two-thirds of users said that the information found had ‘helped a lot’ in being better informed. Just under half felt that the information they found had helped in their dealings with the doctor, while just over half felt that information found had changed the way they felt about their condition. More importantly, over one-third of respondents said that their condition had improved after having visited the site and more than one in four said that Web information had resulted in a deferred visit or had actually replaced a visit to the doctor.

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, 265-276 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/016555150102700409


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
M. Mackert, B. Love, and P. Whitten
Patient education on mobile devices: an e-health intervention for low health literate audiences
Journal of Information Science, February 1, 2009; 35(1): 82 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
J. Kivits
Informed Patients and the Internet: A Mediated Context for Consultations with Health Professionals
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2006; 11(2): 269 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, P. Williams, and B. Gunter
An Evaluation of the Health Applications (and Implications) of Digital Interactive Television: Case Study of the Livinghealth Channel
Journal of Information Science, June 1, 2003; 29(3): 181 - 192.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, P. Williams, and M. Jordan
NHS Direct Online: its users and their concerns
Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2002; 28(4): 305 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]