Journal of Information Science

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warner, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Journal of Information Science, Vol. 26, No. 6, 453-459 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/016555150002600607

A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises

Julian Warner

The Queen’s University of Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, j.warner{at}qub.ac.uk

The Research Assessment Exercises (RAE) conducted in the UK have attractedvarious types of published response. These include citation analyses and a review of the public reception of the RAE 1996, which included a brief critique of the citation studies.

This paper develops the critique. Largely unexplored issues in the theory or assumptions of bibliometrics, e.g. the level of citation which corresponds to a quantum of research quality, are found to emerge in the studies. A weak, and unsatisfactorily treated, correlation between citation aggregates and research quality for individual entities is revealed. The proposal to replace informed peer review by citation analysis is regarded as highly unrealistic.

Productive uses for citation analysis in research evaluation are suggested. A historically rare instance of correlation between rankings derived from citation aggregates and from real world peer review has been revealed by the studies. The future value of citation analysis could be to inform, but not to determine, judgements of research quality.

A combination of methods is advocated for future studies of the RAEs. Information science must attend to considerations of value, as well as using established techniques, if it is to avoid marginalisation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
I. Aaltojarvi, I. Arminen, O. Auranen, and H.-M. Pasanen
Scientific Productivity, Web Visibility and Citation Patterns in Sixteen Nordic Sociology Departments
Acta Sociologica, March 1, 2008; 51(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of EvaluationHome page
J. M. Diaz-Puente, A. Cazorla, and A. Dorrego
Crossing National, Continental, and Linguistic Boundaries: Toward a Worldwide Evaluation Research Community in Journals of Evaluation
American Journal of Evaluation, December 1, 2007; 28(4): 399 - 415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
V. Bence and C. Oppenheim
The Influence of Peer Review on the Research Assessment Exercise
Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2004; 30(4): 347 - 368.
[Abstract] [PDF]