Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Approaches to the measurement of the impact of knowledge management programmes

William J. Martin

RMIT University, Australia, bill.martin{at}rmit.edu.au

There is currently widespread interest in knowledge management, with organisations of all kinds investing in technologies, systems and people to this end. Concurrently, within business and the economy as a whole, intellectual capital or intangible assets are growing in significance in relation to traditional tangible assets such as buildings and equipment. Many organisations are finding that traditional measures of organisational performance are insufficient for the task of managing intangibles. In trying to measure the value of knowledge inputs and outputs, such metrics as return on investment or the practice of consigning intangibles to the accounting category of goodwill need to be supplemented by alternative approaches. This paper looks at the problem of knowledge measurement and, in reviewing some of the current alternatives, argues for the importance of metrics to the overall process of knowledge management. The significance of knowledge measurement to the information science community is emphasised.

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 26, No. 1, 21-27 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/016555150002600102


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
V. R. Montequin, F. O. Fernandez, V. A. Cabal, and N. R. Gutierrez
An integrated framework for intellectual capital measurement and knowledge management implementation in small and medium-sized enterprises
Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2006; 32(6): 525 - 538.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Management LearningHome page
I. M. Prieto and E. Revilla
Assessing the Impact of Learning Capability on Business Performance: Empirical Evidence from Spain
Management Learning, December 1, 2006; 37(4): 499 - 522.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
P. Yates-Mercer and D. Bawden
Managing the paradox: the valuation of knowledge and knowledge management
Journal of Information Science, February 1, 2002; 28(1): 19 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]