Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koenig, M. E.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Information policy - the mounting tension (value additive versus uniquely distributable 'public good')

Michael E.D. Koenig

Rosary College, River Forest, IL, USA

This paper posits that there is a fundamental and less than adequately recognized tension underlying information policy issues. That tension is between the nature of infor mation as inherently a value-added product and the nature of information as a commodity with compelling 'public good' characteristics and with unique properties of trans ferability and distributability. These conflicting properties of information each attempt to drive information policy in opposite directions. The magnitude of those forces is to a large degree a function of information technology, and changes in information technology therefore change the balance between those forces and require new solutions. Furthermore, the present accelerating changes in informa tion technology are tending not only to change the balance point between those factors, but, even more interesting and less recognized, they tend to make more compelling the forces and the arguments on either side of that balance point. Thus, information policy decisions are inevitably becoming increasingly difficult to arrive at, as each side sees the logic of its side become ever more compelling, while often failing to see that precisely the same is happening to the arguments of the other side. We need to understand this phenomenon if we are to intelligently guide the information policy process.

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 21, No. 3, 229-231 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/016555159502100308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Information ScienceHome page
E. Orna
Information policies: yesterday, today, tomorrow
Journal of Information Science, August 1, 2008; 34(4): 547 - 565.
[Abstract] [PDF]