Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Information Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baird, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Oppenheim, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Do citations matter?

Laura M. Baird

University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

Charles Oppenheim

University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK

Citation indexes are based on the principle of authors citing previous articles of relevance. The paper demonstrates the long history of citing for precedent and notes how ISI's citation indexes differ from Shepards Citations. The paper analyses some of the criticisms of citation counting, and some of the uses for which citation analysis has been employed. The paper also examines the idea of the development of an Acknowledgements Index, and concludes such an index is unlikely to be commercially viable. The paper describes a citation study of Eugene Garfield, and concludes that he may be the most heavily cited information scientist, that he is a heavy self-citer, and that the reasons why other authors cite Garfield are different from the reasons why he cites himself. The paper concludes that citation studies remain a valid method of analysis of individuals', institutions', or journals' impact, but need to be used with caution and in conjunction with other measures.

Journal of Information Science, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2-15 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/016555159402000102
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Information ScienceHome page
S. Macdonald and J. Kam
Aardvark et al.: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies
Journal of Information Science, December 1, 2007; 33(6): 702 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Information ScienceHome page
Lim Ban Seng and P. Willett
The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools
Journal of Information Science, January 1, 1995; 21(1): 68 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Journal of Information ScienceHome page
S. McDonald and J. Feather
British library and information science journals: a study of quality control
Journal of Information Science, January 1, 1995; 21(5): 359 - 369.
[Abstract] [PDF]